CHECK 1

Name the wanted function before the hardware

Ask what the customer wants from the system and which practical requirement influences acceptance. Interest in a visible component is different from a confirmed need for a supported function. The configuration comparison keeps the actual period in view rather than turning a translated trim name into a complete statement about every installed system.

Separate essentials, optional benefits and preferences driven chiefly by appearance. The buyer may reasonably choose a simpler supported arrangement if it performs the actual task. Record that alternative instead of pricing every additional hardware item as equal value or promising that a higher package automatically supplies the same benefit in all operating conditions and destinations.

CHECK 2

Establish candidate-specific equipment evidence

Use original configuration records and relevant actual media linked to the unit reference. The period identity guide prevents current presentations describing earlier offers. Familiar names can appear in different contexts; do not merge equipment from several periods into one attractive specification for the car being quoted.

Keep fitted presence separate from demonstrated operation. A visible sensor, menu or broad seller assurance cannot prove every advertised function. If the offered unit changes, update the evidence rather than carrying a favourable clip or finding across through the badge. The candidate that earns the premium should be the one whose equipment and relevant observations the customer actually reviewed.

CHECK 3

Resolve receiving-user and software questions

The function-level access review retains relevant software, account and destination requirements. A demonstration under the seller's current arrangement may not settle continuing availability after transfer. Obtain the appropriate provider answer for the actual wanted method and identify outstanding dependencies before valuing it as a benefit to the buyer.

Keep the answer within its supported scope. A familiar display language or successful menu response is not proof of every service, and general brand confidence cannot establish all receiving-provider capabilities. If a feature remains unresolved, record whether the customer accepts the car without crediting that benefit or defers the decision until useful evidence is available.

CHECK 4

Keep demonstrations within supported use

Ask for relevant ordinary observations under appropriate manufacturer instructions, retaining conditions and limits. Do not request hazardous manoeuvres or interpret a short favourable clip as unrestricted capability. The buyer needs to know what was actually observed and what remains untested, rather than a theatrical demonstration designed to imply that attention and judgement are unnecessary.

Separate useful assistance from the complete driving and parking task. The parking-equipment decision keeps specific convenience distinct from physical clearance. A supported feature can still be unsuitable for another environment or requirement, and an attractive equipment package should not silently replace the customer's essential passenger, operating or condition criteria.

CHECK 5

Review related work and current condition

Retain disclosed damage, replaced components and relevant findings for the selected candidate. The windscreen and associated-work review addresses one important repair context separately. A tidy exterior or ordinary warning-free display cannot establish complete assessment of equipment affected by reported work, and a successful demonstration is not a comprehensive condition certificate.

Ask the appropriate provider for supported remedy and completion evidence when needed. The scope comparison keeps future work separate from the ready-to-handover result. Do not invent standard repair costs or a universal hardware premium. Credit the wanted benefit only within the actual supported configuration, operation and current condition proposition offered to the customer.

CHECK 6

A buyer attracted by a component name

Suppose the customer favours one offer because its advertised hardware sounds more advanced, but the wanted function's receiving-user availability is unconfirmed. Resolve that requirement before choosing. More visible equipment does not answer a missing service or transfer question, and unrelated cabin extras cannot silently compensate for an essential limitation.

If the customer accepts a different supported routine, record the revised requirement and useful benefit. Keep relevant condition and repair evidence with that decision. A substitute unit with a similar package name needs its own identity and operation review; approval should follow the individual proposition rather than an unqualified hierarchy of assistance labels.

Choose the next action

Finding or requirementPurchase response
Hardware appeal drives the preferenceIdentify the actual supported function the customer needs.
Seller setup is the only evidenceResolve receiving-user access and document observation limits.
Relevant components have been repairedRetain qualified applicable findings and completed work records.

Questions buyers ask

Does visible hardware prove every assistance feature?

No. Verify configuration, supported function and actual availability separately.

Can an assistance label guarantee unattended driving?

No. Preserve manufacturer instructions, operating limits and driver responsibilities.

Manufacturer context: 2022 L9 introduction, 2024 L-series update, and May 2026 L9 announcement (PDF). The actual offer requires its own specification and condition evidence.

TURN THE CHECKS INTO A BUYING BRIEF

Discuss your Li L9 requirements.

Include destination, quantity, condition and version preference. State what must be verified before acceptance; actual availability and commercial terms need confirmation.

Prepare your enquiry ↗